[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220824050213.3643599-2-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:02:08 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] xfrm: fix refcount leak in __xfrm_policy_check()
From: Xin Xiong <xiongx18@...an.edu.cn>
The issue happens on an error path in __xfrm_policy_check(). When the
fetching process of the object `pols[1]` fails, the function simply
returns 0, forgetting to decrement the reference count of `pols[0]`,
which is incremented earlier by either xfrm_sk_policy_lookup() or
xfrm_policy_lookup(). This may result in memory leaks.
Fix it by decreasing the reference count of `pols[0]` in that path.
Fixes: 134b0fc544ba ("IPsec: propagate security module errors up from flow_cache_lookup")
Signed-off-by: Xin Xiong <xiongx18@...an.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index f1a0bab920a5..4f8bbb825abc 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -3599,6 +3599,7 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (pols[1]) {
if (IS_ERR(pols[1])) {
XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINPOLERROR);
+ xfrm_pol_put(pols[0]);
return 0;
}
pols[1]->curlft.use_time = ktime_get_real_seconds();
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists