netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8e6c30df4e9b0ab4a701fab3b6ba8f6c@kapio-technology.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:28:03 +0200
From:   netdev@...io-technology.com
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry
 flag to drivers

On 2022-08-25 11:36, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 01:41:51PM +0200, netdev@...io-technology.com 
> wrote:
>> On 2022-08-23 08:48, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm not good at naming, but "blackhole" is at least consistent with what
>> > we already have for routes and nexthop objects.
>> >
>> 
>> I have changed it the name "masked", as that is also the term used in 
>> the
>> documentation for the zero-DPV entries, and I think that it will 
>> generally
>> be a more accepted term.
> 
> "blackhole" is an already accepted term and at least to me it is much
> more clear than "masked". Keep in mind that both L2 neighbours (FDB) 
> and
> L3 neighbours share the same uAPI and eventually we might want to 
> extend
> the use of this flag for L3 neighbours (at least Spectrum supports it),
> so it needs to make sense for both.

Okay, I will do that then...