netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: page_counter: rearrange struct page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALvZod6tFce5Ld9rh-xt495S+A-vi4Curkja2YYyf0VizKw1tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:24:02 -0700
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: page_counter: rearrange struct page_counter fields

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:21 PM Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 21:41:42 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > > Did you evaluate the effects of using a per-cpu counter of some form?
> >
> > Do you mean per-cpu counter for usage or something else?
>
> percpu_counter, perhaps.  Or some hand-rolled thing if that's more suitable.
>
> > The usage
> > needs to be compared against the limits and accumulating per-cpu is
> > costly particularly on larger machines,
>
> Well, there are tricks one can play.  For example, only run
> __percpu_counter_sum() when `usage' is close to its limit.
>
> I'd suggest flinging together a prototype which simply uses
> percpu_counter_read() all the time.  If the performance testing results
> are sufficiently promising, then look into the accuracy issues.
>

Thanks, I will take a stab at that in a week or so.