[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ywca/EqpyQDAWlE2@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:47:24 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: page_counter: rearrange struct page_counter
fields
On Thu 25-08-22 00:05:05, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> With memcg v2 enabled, memcg->memory.usage is a very hot member for
> the workloads doing memcg charging on multiple CPUs concurrently.
> Particularly the network intensive workloads. In addition, there is a
> false cache sharing between memory.usage and memory.high on the charge
> path. This patch moves the usage into a separate cacheline and move all
> the read most fields into separate cacheline.
>
> To evaluate the impact of this optimization, on a 72 CPUs machine, we
> ran the following workload in a three level of cgroup hierarchy.
>
> $ netserver -6
> # 36 instances of netperf with following params
> $ netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K
>
> Results (average throughput of netperf):
> Without (6.0-rc1) 10482.7 Mbps
> With patch 12413.7 Mbps (18.4% improvement)
>
> With the patch, the throughput improved by 18.4%.
>
> One side-effect of this patch is the increase in the size of struct
> mem_cgroup. For example with this patch on 64 bit build, the size of
> struct mem_cgroup increased from 4032 bytes to 4416 bytes. However for
> the performance improvement, this additional size is worth it. In
> addition there are opportunities to reduce the size of struct
> mem_cgroup like deprecation of kmem and tcpmem page counters and
> better packing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
One nit below
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Updated the commit message
> - Make struct page_counter cache align.
>
> include/linux/page_counter.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_counter.h b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> index 679591301994..78a1c934e416 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> @@ -3,15 +3,26 @@
> #define _LINUX_PAGE_COUNTER_H
>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/cache.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> +struct pc_padding {
> + char x[0];
> +} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
> +#define PC_PADDING(name) struct pc_padding name
> +#else
> +#define PC_PADDING(name)
> +#endif
> +
> struct page_counter {
> + /*
> + * Make sure 'usage' does not share cacheline with any other field. The
> + * memcg->memory.usage is a hot member of struct mem_cgroup.
> + */
> atomic_long_t usage;
> - unsigned long min;
> - unsigned long low;
> - unsigned long high;
> - unsigned long max;
> + PC_PADDING(_pad1_);
>
> /* effective memory.min and memory.min usage tracking */
> unsigned long emin;
> @@ -23,18 +34,18 @@ struct page_counter {
> atomic_long_t low_usage;
> atomic_long_t children_low_usage;
>
> - /* legacy */
> unsigned long watermark;
> unsigned long failcnt;
These two are also touched in the charging path so we could squeeze them
into the same cache line as usage.
0-day machinery was quite good at hitting noticeable regression anytime
we have changed layout so let's see what they come up with after this
patch ;)
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists