netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] sfc: support PTP over IPv6/UDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220826162731.5c153f7e@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:27:31 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
Cc:     ecree.xilinx@...il.com, habetsm.xilinx@...il.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] sfc: support PTP over IPv6/UDP

On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:39:44 +0200 Íñigo Huguet wrote:
> > > +static inline int
> > > +efx_filter_set_ipv6_local(struct efx_filter_spec *spec, u8 proto,
> > > +                       const struct in6_addr *host, __be16 port)  
> >
> > also - unclear why this is defined in the header
> 
> This is just because it's the equivalent of other already existing
> similar functions in that file. I think I should keep this one
> untouched for cohesion.

We usually defer refactoring for coding style issues until someone 
is otherwise touching the code, so surrounding code doing something
against the guidance may be misleading.