lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220829135229.rcyefaabajt3btqt@sgarzare-redhat> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:52:29 +0200 From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>, "haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, "sthemmin@...rosoft.com" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>, "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>, Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>, VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:57:01PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: >On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 16:30 -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:18:52PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> > On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:14:10 -0400 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> > > Stefano will be online again on Monday. I suggest we wait for him to >> > > review this series. If it's urgent, please let me know and I'll take a >> > > look. >> > >> > It was already applied, sorry about that. But please continue with >> > review as if it wasn't. We'll just revert based on Stefano's feedback >> > as needed. Just back, and I'm fine with this version, so thanks for merging! I also run tests with virtio-vsock and everything is fine. >> >> Okay, no problem. > >For the records, I applied the series since it looked to me Arseniy >addressed all the feedback from Stefano on the first patch (the only >one still lacking an acked-by/reviewed-by tag) and I thought it would >be better avoiding such delay. Yep, from v3 I asked some changes on the first patch that Arseniy addressed in this version, and we were waiting an ack for VMCI changes (thanks Vishnu for giving it). So, it should be fine. Thanks, Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists