lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO-hwJ+zJZzRXaj3ZGSaz9N3p7hE0mdcbsxTK04L-ep7_podFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:30:26 +0200
From:   Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@...ux.intel.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 24/24] Documentation: add HID-BPF docs

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 4:53 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 05:36:25PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > +When (and why) to use HID-BPF
> > +=============================
> > +
> > +We can enumerate several use cases for when using HID-BPF is better than
> > +using a standard kernel driver fix:
> > +
>
> Better say "There are several use cases when using HID-BPF is better
> than standard kernel driver fix:"

OK, included locally, and will send it in v10.

>
> > +When a BPF program needs to emit input events, it needs to talk HID, and rely
> > +on the HID kernel processing to translate the HID data into input events.
> > +
>
> talk to HID?

Replaced with "it needs to talk with the HID protocol".

>
> Otherwise the documentation LGTM (no new warnings caused by the doc).

Great, thanks a lot for the review :)

Cheers,
Benjamin

>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ