[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9f474f0761f77d093db88da05d536cb@kapio-technology.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:19:16 +0200
From: netdev@...io-technology.com
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 1/6] net: bridge: add locked entry fdb flag to
extend locked port feature
On 2022-08-29 18:12, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 04:02:46PM +0200, netdev@...io-technology.com
> wrote:
>> On 2022-08-27 13:30, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> > On 26/08/2022 14:45, Hans Schultz wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > Please add the blackhole flag in a separate patch.
>> > A few more comments and questions below..
>> >
>>
>> Hi,
>> if userspace is to set this flag I think I need to change stuff in
>> rtnetlink.c, as I will need to extent struct ndmsg with a new u32
>> entry as
>> the old u8 flags is full.
>
> You cannot extend 'struct ndmsg'. That's why 'NDA_FLAGS_EXT' was
> introduced. See:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2c611ad97a82b51221bb0920cc6cac0b1d4c0e52
>
> 'NTF_EXT_BLACKHOLE' belongs in 'NDA_FLAGS_EXT' like you have it now,
> but
> the kernel should not reject it in br_fdb_add().
>
>> Maybe this is straight forward, but I am not so sure as I don't know
>> that
>> code too well. Maybe someone can give me a hint...?
The question I have is if I can use nlh_flags to send the extended flags
further on to fdb_add_entry(), where I expect to need it?
(the extended flags are u32, while nlh_flags are u16)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists