netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] sfc: support PTP over IPv6/UDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:47:33 +0100
From:   Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To:     Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     habetsm.xilinx@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] sfc: support PTP over IPv6/UDP

On 26/08/2022 07:39, Íñigo Huguet wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:32 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:02:41 +0200 Íñigo Huguet wrote:
>>> +static inline int
>>> +efx_filter_set_ipv6_local(struct efx_filter_spec *spec, u8 proto,
>>> +                       const struct in6_addr *host, __be16 port)
>>
>> also - unclear why this is defined in the header
>>
> 
> This is just because it's the equivalent of other already existing
> similar functions in that file. I think I should keep this one
> untouched for cohesion.
My preference would be to keep this in filter.h as Íñigo currently
 has it, to follow the existing pattern.  These "populate a filter
 spec" functions are really just typesafe macros.

-ed