[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220830185656.268523-2-eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:56:55 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] tcp: annotate data-race around challenge_timestamp
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
challenge_timestamp can be read an written by concurrent threads.
This was expected, but we need to annotate the race to avoid potential issues.
Following patch moves challenge_timestamp and challenge_count
to per-netns storage to provide better isolation.
Fixes: 354e4aa391ed ("tcp: RFC 5961 5.2 Blind Data Injection Attack Mitigation")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index ab5f0ea166f1a0535e299a9051406b5e2895f1f0..c184e15397a28ccfbac142ff0f1d05d555623147 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3629,11 +3629,11 @@ static void tcp_send_challenge_ack(struct sock *sk)
/* Then check host-wide RFC 5961 rate limit. */
now = jiffies / HZ;
- if (now != challenge_timestamp) {
+ if (now != READ_ONCE(challenge_timestamp)) {
u32 ack_limit = READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_challenge_ack_limit);
u32 half = (ack_limit + 1) >> 1;
- challenge_timestamp = now;
+ WRITE_ONCE(challenge_timestamp, now);
WRITE_ONCE(challenge_count, half + prandom_u32_max(ack_limit));
}
count = READ_ONCE(challenge_count);
--
2.37.2.672.g94769d06f0-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists