netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: dsa: microchip: add KSZ9896 switch support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e7ba61d7-de75-3cfe-ee92-3f234dd36289@smile.fr>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:43:27 +0200
From:   Romain Naour <romain.naour@...le.fr>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, pabeni@...hat.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, woojung.huh@...rochip.com,
        Romain Naour <romain.naour@....com>,
        Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: dsa: microchip: add KSZ9896 switch support

Hi Vladimir,

Le 31/08/2022 à 17:38, Vladimir Oltean a écrit :
> Hi Romain,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:58:59AM +0200, Romain Naour wrote:
>> It seems that the KSZ9896 support has been sent to the kernel netdev
>> mailing list a while ago but no further patch was sent after the
>> initial review:
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg554771.html
>>
>> The initial testing with the ksz9896 was done on a 5.10 kernel
>> but due to recent changes in dsa microchip driver it was required
>> to rework this initial version for 6.0-rc2 kernel.
>>
>> v2: remove duplicated SoB line
> 
> To be clear, was the patch also tested on net-next, or only formatted there?

The patch was runtime tested on a 6.0-rc2 kernel and a second time on a 6.0-rc3
kernel but not on net-next.

Is it ok with rc releases or do I need to test on net-next too?

Best regards,
Romain