lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cba0d678-259b-7802-85c1-0cb15dcbb63f@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:49:45 +0100 From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com> To: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>, habetsm.xilinx@...il.com Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] sfc: support PTP over IPv6/UDP On 31/08/2022 11:16, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > commit bd4a2697e5e2 ("sfc: use hardware tx timestamps for more than > PTP") added support for hardware timestamping on TX for cards of the > 8000 series and newer, in an effort to provide support for other > transports other than IPv4/UDP. > > However, timestamping was still not working on RX for these other > transports. This patch add support for PTP over IPv6/UDP. > > Tested: sync as master and as slave is correct using ptp4l from linuxptp > package, both with IPv4 and IPv6. > > Suggested-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com> > Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com> > --- <snip>> - rc = efx_filter_insert_filter(efx, &rxfilter, true); > + int rc = efx_filter_insert_filter(efx, rxfilter, true); > if (rc < 0) > return rc; > - > ptp->rxfilters[ptp->rxfilters_count] = rc; > ptp->rxfilters_count++; > - > return 0; > } These whitespace changes seem like churn given that this code was added in patch #1. If respinning maybe make the two consistent? -ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists