[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46edeb7a-da56-e3f2-a823-a025b9386639@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 20:30:52 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Edwin Brossette <edwin.brossette@...nd.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ip: fix triggering of 'icmp redirect'
On 8/29/22 4:01 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> __mkroute_input() uses fib_validate_source() to trigger an icmp redirect.
> My understanding is that fib_validate_source() is used to know if the src
> address and the gateway address are on the same link. For that,
> fib_validate_source() returns 1 (same link) or 0 (not the same network).
> __mkroute_input() is the only user of these positive values, all other
> callers only look if the returned value is negative.
>
> Since the below patch, fib_validate_source() didn't return anymore 1 when
> both addresses are on the same network, because the route lookup returns
> RT_SCOPE_LINK instead of RT_SCOPE_HOST. But this is, in fact, right.
> Let's adapat the test to return 1 again when both addresses are on the same
> link.
>
> CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 747c14307214 ("ip: fix dflt addr selection for connected nexthop")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> ---
>
> This code exists since more than two decades:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netdev-vger-cvs.git/commit/?id=0c2c94df8133f
>
> Please, feel free to comment if my analysis seems wrong.
>
> Regards,
> Nicolas
>
> net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> index f361d3d56be2..943edf4ad4db 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static int __fib_validate_source(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 src, __be32 dst,
> dev_match = dev_match || (res.type == RTN_LOCAL &&
> dev == net->loopback_dev);
> if (dev_match) {
> - ret = FIB_RES_NHC(res)->nhc_scope >= RT_SCOPE_HOST;
> + ret = FIB_RES_NHC(res)->nhc_scope >= RT_SCOPE_LINK;
> return ret;
> }
> if (no_addr)
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static int __fib_validate_source(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 src, __be32 dst,
> ret = 0;
> if (fib_lookup(net, &fl4, &res, FIB_LOOKUP_IGNORE_LINKSTATE) == 0) {
> if (res.type == RTN_UNICAST)
> - ret = FIB_RES_NHC(res)->nhc_scope >= RT_SCOPE_HOST;
> + ret = FIB_RES_NHC(res)->nhc_scope >= RT_SCOPE_LINK;
> }
> return ret;
>
Looks ok to me.
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists