[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB553413FEE0C3C357010CDBB3C77B9@DM6PR12MB5534.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 15:32:13 +0000
From: David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"cai.huoqing@...ux.dev" <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>,
"brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>, Liming Sun <limings@...dia.com>,
Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v1] mlxbf_gige: compute MDIO period based on i1clk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 9:49 PM
> To: David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; pabeni@...hat.com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; cai.huoqing@...ux.dev; brgl@...ev.pl; Liming Sun
> <limings@...dia.com>; Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] mlxbf_gige: compute MDIO period based on i1clk
>
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:59:16 -0400 David Thompson wrote:
> > This patch adds logic to compute the MDIO period based on the i1clk,
> > and thereafter write the MDIO period into the YU MDIO config register.
> > The i1clk resource from the ACPI table is used to provide addressing
> > to YU bootrecord PLL registers.
> > The values in these registers are used to compute MDIO period.
> > If the i1clk resource is not present in the ACPI table, then the
> > current default hardcorded value of 430Mhz is used.
> > The i1clk clock value of 430MHz is only accurate for boards with BF2
> > mid bin and main bin SoCs. The BF2 high bin SoCs have i1clk = 500MHz,
> > but can support a slower MDIO period.
> >
> > Fixes: f92e1869d74e ("Add Mellanox BlueField Gigabit Ethernet driver")
> > Reviewed-by: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>
>
> Hm, why did you repost this?
I reposted because the first post failed the "netdev/cc_maintainers" test:
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: limings@...dia.com; 1 maintainers not CCed: limings@...dia.com
In the second post I included "limings@...dia.com" .
- Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists