[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0f0bcb579a7e214c8286830375dae14d64b1af25.1662050126.git.lorenzo@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 18:43:25 +0200
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, pablo@...filter.org,
fw@...len.de, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, brouer@...hat.com, toke@...hat.com,
memxor@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: Extend KF_TRUSTED_ARGS test for __ref annotation
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Extend the existing test for KF_TRUSTED_ARGS by also checking whether
the same happens when a __ref suffix is present in argument name of a
kfunc.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 38 +++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index 3fb4f69b1962..891fcda50d9d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
.errstr = "variable ptr_ access var_off=(0x0; 0x7) disallowed",
},
{
- "calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID",
+ "calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID (KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
@@ -227,10 +227,30 @@
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 16),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 16),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
+ { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
+ { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_trusted", 7 },
+ },
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "R1 must be referenced",
+},
+{
+ "calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID (__ref)",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 16),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
@@ -238,8 +258,7 @@
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
- { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 8 },
- { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 10 },
+ { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 7 },
},
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = REJECT,
@@ -259,14 +278,17 @@
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 },
- { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 8 },
- { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 10 },
+ { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_trusted", 8 },
+ { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref", 10 },
+ { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 12 },
},
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
--
2.37.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists