netdev - Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v4 00/25] net: dpaa: Cleanups in preparation for phylink conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:51:03 -0400
From:   Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@....com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v4 00/25] net: dpaa: Cleanups in
 preparation for phylink conversion



On 9/2/22 5:32 PM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> On 8/18/22 3:28 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:14:04 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> > Ack, no question. I'm trying to tell you got to actually get stuff in.
>>> > It's the first week after the merge window and people are dumping code
>>> > the had written over the dead time on the list, while some reviewers
>>> > and maintainers are still on their summer vacation. So being
>>> > considerate is even more important than normally.  
>>> 
>>> OK, so perhaps a nice place to split the series is after patch 11. If
>>> you would like to review/apply a set of <15 patches, that is the place
>>> to break things. I can of course resend again with just those, if that's
>>> what I need to do to get these applied.
>> 
>> Mm, okay, let's give folks the customary 24h to object, otherwise I'll
>> pull in the first 11 tomorrow.
> 
> OK, it's been around two weeks. Aside from one bugfix (thanks Dan), there
> has been no further feedback on this series. Can we apply the second half?

Actually, the mentioned bugfix causes this series not to apply. I'm resending
the second half.

--Sean