lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <d4459e45-2cf1-92f5-2de0-52e70882c883@seco.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:51:03 -0400 From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@....com>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v4 00/25] net: dpaa: Cleanups in preparation for phylink conversion On 9/2/22 5:32 PM, Sean Anderson wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > On 8/18/22 3:28 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:14:04 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote: >>> > Ack, no question. I'm trying to tell you got to actually get stuff in. >>> > It's the first week after the merge window and people are dumping code >>> > the had written over the dead time on the list, while some reviewers >>> > and maintainers are still on their summer vacation. So being >>> > considerate is even more important than normally. >>> >>> OK, so perhaps a nice place to split the series is after patch 11. If >>> you would like to review/apply a set of <15 patches, that is the place >>> to break things. I can of course resend again with just those, if that's >>> what I need to do to get these applied. >> >> Mm, okay, let's give folks the customary 24h to object, otherwise I'll >> pull in the first 11 tomorrow. > > OK, it's been around two weeks. Aside from one bugfix (thanks Dan), there > has been no further feedback on this series. Can we apply the second half? Actually, the mentioned bugfix causes this series not to apply. I'm resending the second half. --Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists