netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/4] netfilter: remove nf_conntrack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 19:43:23 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] netfilter: remove nf_conntrack_helper sysctl
 and modparam toggles

On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:39:28 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote:
> > From the description itself it's unclear why this is a part of a net PR.
> > Could you elucidate?  
> 
> Yes, there is improper checking in the irc dcc helper, its possible to
> trigger the 'please do dynamic port forward' from outside by embedding
> a 'DCC' in a PING request; if the client echos that back a expectation/
> port forward gets added.

I see, thanks!

> A fix for this will come in the next net PR, however, one part of the
> issue is that point-blank-autassign is problematic and that helpers
> should only be enabled for addresses that need it.
> 
> If you like I can resend the PR with an updated cover letter, or resend
> with the dcc helper fix included as well.

No need, I'll fold more of your explanation into the merge commit,
should be good enough.