netdev - Re: 答复: [PATCH net-next] driver: cadence macb driver support acpi mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YxYuRaXxtyMIF/A6@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 5 Sep 2022 19:13:41 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Xiaowu Ding <xiaowu.ding@...uarmicro.com>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        "claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com" <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        "palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>,
        "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH net-next] driver:
 cadence macb driver support acpi mode

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 02:25:06AM +0000, Xiaowu Ding wrote:
> Hi Andrew:
> 	Thank you very much for your advices.
>  
> 	There will be some problems with the clk_hw_register_fixed_rate interface in the acpi mode.
> 	It seems that the kernel common clock framework can not support the acpi mode,just support the dt mode.

It has two modes:

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0-rc4/source/drivers/clk/clkdev.c#L100
struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
{
	const char *dev_id = dev ? dev_name(dev) : NULL;
	struct clk_hw *hw;

	if (dev && dev->of_node) {
		hw = of_clk_get_hw(dev->of_node, 0, con_id);
		if (!IS_ERR(hw) || PTR_ERR(hw) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
			return clk_hw_create_clk(dev, hw, dev_id, con_id);
	}

	return __clk_get_sys(dev, dev_id, con_id);
}

If dev has an of_node, it uses of_clk_get_hw().

If dev does not have an of node, it uses __clk_get_sys(), which looks
purely using the clock name.

The common clock framework is older than DT, and so does not force you
to use DT. Please look at making __clk_get_sys() work for you
scenario. You should just need to register the fixed clock using the
correct name. Look at some of the very old boards which have not been
converted to DT.

   Andrew