netdev - Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  5 Sep 2022 15:18:10 +0800
From:   liuyacan@...p.netease.com
To:     tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, liuyacan@...p.netease.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com,
        wintera@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear

> > From: Yacan Liu <liuyacan@...p.netease.com>
> > 
> > After modifying the QP to the Error state, all RX WR would be completed
> > with WC in IB_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR status. Current implementation does not
> > wait for it is done, but destroy the QP and free the link group directly.
> > So there is a risk that accessing the freed memory in tasklet context.
> > 
> > Here is a crash example:
> > 
> >  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff8f220860
> >  #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> >  #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> >  PGD f7300e067 P4D f7300e067 PUD f7300f063 PMD 8c4e45063 PTE 800ffff08c9df060
> >  Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI
> >  CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S         OE     5.10.0-0607+ #23
> >  Hardware name: Inspur NF5280M4/YZMB-00689-101, BIOS 4.1.20 07/09/2018
> >  RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x176/0x1b0
> >  Code: f3 90 48 8b 32 48 85 f6 74 f6 eb d5 c1 ee 12 83 e0 03 83 ee 01 48 c1 e0 05 48 63 f6 48 05 00 c8 02 00 48 03 04 f5 00 09 98 8e <48> 89 10 8b 42 08 85 c0 75 09 f3 90 8b 42 08 85 c0 74 f7 48 8b 32
> >  RSP: 0018:ffffb3b6c001ebd8 EFLAGS: 00010086
> >  RAX: ffffffff8f220860 RBX: 0000000000000246 RCX: 0000000000080000
> >  RDX: ffff91db1f86c800 RSI: 000000000000173c RDI: ffff91db62bace00
> >  RBP: ffff91db62bacc00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c00000010000028b
> >  R10: 0000000000055198 R11: ffffb3b6c001ea58 R12: ffff91db80e05010
> >  R13: 000000000000000a R14: 0000000000000006 R15: 0000000000000040
> >  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff91db1f840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> >  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> >  CR2: ffffffff8f220860 CR3: 00000001f9580004 CR4: 00000000003706e0
> >  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> >  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> >  Call Trace:
> >   <IRQ>
> >   _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0x40
> >   mlx5_ib_poll_cq+0x4c/0xc50 [mlx5_ib]
> >   smc_wr_rx_tasklet_fn+0x56/0xa0 [smc]
> >   tasklet_action_common.isra.21+0x66/0x100
> >   __do_softirq+0xd5/0x29c
> >   asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
> >   </IRQ>
> >   do_softirq_own_stack+0x37/0x40
> >   irq_exit_rcu+0x9d/0xa0
> >   sysvec_call_function_single+0x34/0x80
> >   asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x12/0x20
> > 
> > Fixes: bd4ad57718cc ("smc: initialize IB transport incl. PD, MR, QP, CQ, event, WR")
> > Signed-off-by: Yacan Liu <liuyacan@...p.netease.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > Chagen in v4:
> >   -- Remove the rx_drain flag because smc_wr_rx_post() may not have been called.
> >   -- Remove timeout.
> > Change in v3:
> >   -- Tune commit message (Signed-Off tag, Fixes tag).
> >      Tune code to avoid column length exceeding.
> > Change in v2:
> >   -- Fix some compile warnings and errors.
> > ---
> >  net/smc/smc_core.c | 2 ++
> >  net/smc/smc_core.h | 2 ++
> >  net/smc/smc_wr.c   | 9 +++++++++
> >  net/smc/smc_wr.h   | 1 +
> >  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> > index ff49a11f5..f92a916e9 100644
> > --- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
> > +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> > @@ -757,6 +757,7 @@ int smcr_link_init(struct smc_link_group *lgr, struct smc_link *lnk,
> >  	lnk->lgr = lgr;
> >  	smc_lgr_hold(lgr); /* lgr_put in smcr_link_clear() */
> >  	lnk->link_idx = link_idx;
> > +	lnk->wr_rx_id_compl = 0;
> >  	smc_ibdev_cnt_inc(lnk);
> >  	smcr_copy_dev_info_to_link(lnk);
> >  	atomic_set(&lnk->conn_cnt, 0);
> > @@ -1269,6 +1270,7 @@ void smcr_link_clear(struct smc_link *lnk, bool log)
> >  	smcr_buf_unmap_lgr(lnk);
> >  	smcr_rtoken_clear_link(lnk);
> >  	smc_ib_modify_qp_error(lnk);
> > +	smc_wr_drain_cq(lnk);
> 
> smc_wr_drain_cq() can put into smc_wr_free_link(). Since
> smc_wr_free_link() do the same things together, such as waiting for
> resources cleaning up about wr.
> 
> >  	smc_wr_free_link(lnk);
> >  	smc_ib_destroy_queue_pair(lnk);
> >  	smc_ib_dealloc_protection_domain(lnk);
> 
> <snip>
> 
> The patch tested good in our environment. If you are going to send the
> v5 patch, you can go with my review.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Cheers,
> Tony Lu

Thank you very much for your verification and suggestion!

Regards,
Yacan