[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxdG6r0pF7NSW+EJ@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 15:11:06 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: phy: aquantia: wait for the suspend/resume
operations to finish
> +static int aqr107_wait_processor_intensive_op(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> + int val, err;
> +
> + /* The datasheet notes to wait at least 1ms after issuing a
> + * processor intensive operation before checking.
> + * We cannot use the 'sleep_before_read' parameter of read_poll_timeout
> + * because that just determines the maximum time slept, not the minimum.
> + */
> + usleep_range(1000, 5000);
> +
> + err = phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
> + VEND1_GLOBAL_GEN_STAT2, val,
> + !(val & VEND1_GLOBAL_GEN_STAT2_OP_IN_PROG),
> + AQR107_OP_IN_PROG_SLEEP,
> + AQR107_OP_IN_PROG_TIMEOUT, false);
> + if (err) {
> + phydev_err(phydev, "timeout: processor-intensive MDIO operation\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
nitpick: You could simplify this to:
> + if (err)
> + phydev_err(phydev, "timeout: processor-intensive MDIO operation\n");
> +
> + return err;
> +}
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists