netdev - Re: [PATCH] linkstate: Add macros for link state up/down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:57:28 +0200
From:   Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Alexandru Tachici <alexandru.tachici@...log.com>,
        Hao Chen <chenhao288@...ilicon.com>,
        Olliver Schinagl <oliver+list@...inagl.nl>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linkstate: Add macros for link state up/down

Hey Andrew,

On 06-09-2022 14:18, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:37:54AM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>> The phylink_link_state.state property can be up or down, via 1 and 0.
>>
>> The other link state's (speed, duplex) are defined in ethtool.h so lets
>> add defines for the link-state there as well so we can use macro's to
>> define our up/down states.
> Hi Olliver
>
> The change itself is fine, but we don't add to the API without
> users. Please make use of these two new values somewhere, to show they
> are really useful.
>
>      Andrew

So I've found quite a lot of users, which I suppose is good. I've since 
decided to turn it into an enum, and refer in the structs as `enum 
phy_linkstate link:1` (is this even legal?) Would that ok for v2?


Olliver