lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 14:03:15 +0000
From:   Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
To:     Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
CC:     "dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH main v3 1/2] macsec: add Extended Packet Number support



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> Sent: Sunday, 4 September 2022 18:44
> To: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
> Cc: dsahern@...nel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Raed Salem
> <raeds@...dia.com>; Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH main v3 1/2] macsec: add Extended Packet Number support
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> 2022-09-04, 10:47:28 +0300, Emeel Hakim wrote:
> > @@ -174,14 +186,36 @@ static int parse_sa_args(int *argcp, char
> > ***argvp, struct sa_desc *sa)
> >
> >       while (argc > 0) {
> >               if (strcmp(*argv, "pn") == 0) {
> > -                     if (sa->pn != 0)
> > +                     if (sa->pn.pn64 != 0)
> >                               duparg2("pn", "pn");
> >                       NEXT_ARG();
> > -                     ret = get_u32(&sa->pn, *argv, 0);
> > +                     ret = get_u32(&sa->pn.pn32, *argv, 0);
> > +                     if (ret)
> > +                             invarg("expected pn", *argv);
> > +                     if (sa->pn.pn32 == 0)
> > +                             invarg("expected pn != 0", *argv);
> > +             } else if (strcmp(*argv, "xpn") == 0) {
> > +                     if (sa->pn.pn64 != 0)
> > +                             duparg2("xpn", "xpn");
> > +                     NEXT_ARG();
> > +                     ret = get_u64(&sa->pn.pn64, *argv, 0);
> >                       if (ret)
> >                               invarg("expected pn", *argv);
> > -                     if (sa->pn == 0)
> > +                     if (sa->pn.pn64 == 0)
> >                               invarg("expected pn != 0", *argv);
> > +                     sa->xpn = true;
> > +             } else if (strcmp(*argv, "salt") == 0) {
> > +                     unsigned int len;
> > +
> > +                     NEXT_ARG();
> 
> That should have a duparg check.
>
 
ack

> > +                     if (!hexstring_a2n(*argv, sa->salt, MACSEC_SALT_LEN,
> > +                                        &len))
> > +                             invarg("expected salt", *argv);
> > +             } else if (strcmp(*argv, "ssci") == 0) {
> > +                     NEXT_ARG();
> 
> Also worth a duparg check.
>

ack
 
> > +                     ret = get_ssci(&sa->ssci, *argv);
> > +                     if (ret)
> > +                             invarg("expected ssci", *argv);
> >               } else if (strcmp(*argv, "key") == 0) {
> >                       unsigned int len;
> >
> > @@ -392,9 +426,22 @@ static int do_modify_nl(enum cmd c, enum
> macsec_nl_commands cmd, int ifindex,
> >       addattr8(&req.n, MACSEC_BUFLEN, MACSEC_SA_ATTR_AN, sa->an);
> >
> >       if (c != CMD_DEL) {
> > -             if (sa->pn)
> > +             if (sa->xpn) {
> > +                     if (sa->pn.pn64)
> > +                             addattr64(&req.n, MACSEC_BUFLEN, MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN,
> > +                                       sa->pn.pn64);
> > +                     if (sa->salt[0] != '\0')
> 
> Does the specification say the salt can't start with a 0 byte, or is it just a "salt was
> set" test? If that's coming from the spec, the kernel should also check this.
>
it is just a "salt was set" test
 
> > +                             addattr_l(&req.n, MACSEC_BUFLEN, MACSEC_SA_ATTR_SALT,
> > +                                       sa->salt, MACSEC_SALT_LEN);
> > +                     if (sa->ssci != 0)
> 
> Same question as for the salt.
>
it is just a "ssci was set" test

> For both, I'd just add a salt_set/ssci_set flag to sa_desc, and use it for duparg as
> well.
> 
> > +                             addattr32(&req.n, MACSEC_BUFLEN, MACSEC_SA_ATTR_SSCI,
> > +                                       sa->ssci);
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             if (sa->pn.pn32 && !sa->xpn) {
> 
> Nit: combine this with the previous if:
> 
>     } else if (sa->pn.pn32) {
> 
> 
> >                       addattr32(&req.n, MACSEC_BUFLEN, MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN,
> > -                               sa->pn);
> > +                               sa->pn.pn32);
> > +             }
> >
> >               if (sa->key_len) {
> >                       addattr_l(&req.n, MACSEC_BUFLEN,
> > MACSEC_SA_ATTR_KEYID, @@ -426,10 +473,11 @@ static bool
> check_sa_args(enum cmd c, struct sa_desc *sa)
> >                       return -1;
> >               }
> >
> > -             if (sa->pn == 0) {
> > +             if (sa->pn.pn64 == 0) {
> >                       fprintf(stderr, "must specify a packet number != 0\n");
> >                       return -1;
> >               }
> > +
> 
> Remove that blank line.

ack

> >       } else if (c == CMD_UPD) {
> >               if (sa->key_len) {
> >                       fprintf(stderr, "cannot change key on SA\n");
> 
> [...]
> > @@ -875,8 +930,16 @@ static void print_tx_sc(const char *prefix, __u64 sci,
> __u8 encoding_sa,
> >               print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", prefix);
> >               print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "an", "%d:",
> >                          rta_getattr_u8(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_AN]));
> > -             print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "pn", " PN %u,",
> > -                        rta_getattr_u32(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN]));
> > +             if (!is_xpn) {
> 
> Nit: I'd flip those branches so that the test is "if (is_xpn)"
>
 
ack

> > +                     print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "pn", " PN %u,",
> > +                                rta_getattr_u32(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN]));
> > +             } else {
> > +                     print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "pn", " PN %u,",
> > +                                rta_getattr_u64(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN]));
> > +                     print_0xhex(PRINT_ANY, "ssci",
> > +                                 "SSCI %08x",
> > +                                 ntohl(rta_getattr_u32(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_SSCI])));
> > +             }
> >
> >               print_bool(PRINT_JSON, "active", NULL, state);
> >               print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL,
> 
> [...]
> > @@ -943,8 +1007,16 @@ static void print_rx_sc(const char *prefix, __be64 sci,
> __u8 active,
> >               print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", prefix);
> >               print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "an", "%u:",
> >                          rta_getattr_u8(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_AN]));
> > -             print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "pn", " PN %u,",
> > -                        rta_getattr_u32(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN]));
> > +             if (!is_xpn) {
> 
> Same nit, flip the test.

ack
 
> > +                     print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "pn", " PN %u,",
> > +                                rta_getattr_u32(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN]));
> > +             } else {
> > +                     print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "pn", " PN %u,",
> > +                                rta_getattr_u64(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_PN]));
> > +                     print_0xhex(PRINT_ANY, "ssci",
> > +                                 "SSCI %08x",
> > +                                 ntohl(rta_getattr_u32(sa_attr[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_SSCI])));
> > +             }
> >
> >               print_bool(PRINT_JSON, "active", NULL, state);
> >               print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, " state %s,",
> 
> [...]
> > @@ -989,6 +1062,8 @@ static int process(struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)
> >       int ifindex;
> >       __u64 sci;
> >       __u8 encoding_sa;
> > +     __u64 cid;
> > +     bool is_xpn = false;
> >
> >       if (n->nlmsg_type != genl_family)
> >               return -1;
> > @@ -1032,13 +1107,16 @@ static int process(struct nlmsghdr *n, void
> > *arg)
> >
> >       print_attrs(attrs_secy);
> >
> > -     print_tx_sc("    ", sci, encoding_sa,
> > +     cid = rta_getattr_u64(attrs_secy[MACSEC_SECY_ATTR_CIPHER_SUITE]);
> > +     if (cid == MACSEC_CIPHER_ID_GCM_AES_XPN_128 || cid ==
> > + MACSEC_CIPHER_ID_GCM_AES_XPN_256)
> 
> I'd stuff that in a ciphersuite_is_xpn(cid) helper, and then it's just
>     is_xpn = ciphersuite_is_xpn(cid);

ack

> > +             is_xpn = true;
> > +     print_tx_sc("    ", sci, encoding_sa, is_xpn,
> >                   attrs[MACSEC_ATTR_TXSC_STATS],
> >                   attrs[MACSEC_ATTR_SECY_STATS],
> >                   attrs[MACSEC_ATTR_TXSA_LIST]);
> 
> [...]
> > @@ -1268,7 +1347,7 @@ static int macsec_parse_opt(struct link_util *lu, int
> argc, char **argv,
> >       enum macsec_offload offload;
> >       struct cipher_args cipher = {0};
> >       enum macsec_validation_type validate;
> > -     bool es = false, scb = false, send_sci = false;
> > +     bool es = false, scb = false, send_sci = false, xpn = false;
> >       int replay_protect = -1;
> >       struct sci sci = { 0 };
> >
> > @@ -1388,6 +1467,11 @@ static int macsec_parse_opt(struct link_util *lu, int
> argc, char **argv,
> >                               return ret;
> >                       addattr8(n, MACSEC_BUFLEN,
> >                                IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD, offload);
> > +             } else if (strcmp(*argv, "xpn") == 0) {
> > +                     NEXT_ARG();
> > +                     xpn = parse_on_off("xpn", *argv, &ret);
> 
> I'm not convinced the "xpn on/off" flag is the best API here. How about just
> letting the admin pass the full cipher suite name
> (GCM-AES-XPN-128 or GCM-AES-XPN-256)?
> 
> This xpn flag is not consistent with the dump side (which uses the cipher suite
> only), and it's not consistent with the kernel API, which also doesn't use an XPN
> flag but the cipher suite ID.
> 
> So I'd just add 2 options to "cipher" argument parsing (and extract that to a new
> cs_name_to_id helper, since we'd now have 4 options), and get rid of the "xpn
> on/off" option (and the cipher.id flip to XPN below).
> 

I agree, I will send a V4 with the cipher approach instead of the xpn "on/off"

> > +                     if (ret != 0)
> > +                             return ret;
> >               } else {
> >                       fprintf(stderr, "macsec: unknown command \"%s\"?\n",
> >                               *argv);
> > @@ -1415,6 +1499,13 @@ static int macsec_parse_opt(struct link_util *lu, int
> argc, char **argv,
> >               return -1;
> >       }
> >
> > +     if (xpn) {
> > +             if (cipher.id == MACSEC_CIPHER_ID_GCM_AES_256)
> > +                     cipher.id = MACSEC_CIPHER_ID_GCM_AES_XPN_256;
> > +             else
> > +                     cipher.id = MACSEC_CIPHER_ID_GCM_AES_XPN_128;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       if (cipher.id)
> >               addattr_l(n, MACSEC_BUFLEN, IFLA_MACSEC_CIPHER_SUITE,
> >                         &cipher.id, sizeof(cipher.id));
> > --
> > 2.21.3
> >
> 
> --
> Sabrina

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ