[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR12MB5481D19E1E5DA11B2BD067CFDC419@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 14:33:02 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Gavin Li <gavinl@...dia.com>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"jesse.brandeburg@...el.com" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"sridhar.samudrala@...el.com" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"loseweigh@...il.com" <loseweigh@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org" <virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org>,
Gavi Teitz <gavi@...dia.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 2/2] virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big
packets
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 10:30 AM
[..]
> > > actually how does this waste space? Is this because your device does
> > > not have INDIRECT?
> > VQ is 256 entries deep.
> > Driver posted total of 256 descriptors.
> > Each descriptor points to a page of 4K.
> > These descriptors are chained as 4K * 16.
>
> So without indirect then? with indirect each descriptor can point to 16
> entries.
>
With indirect, can it post 256 * 16 size buffers even though vq depth is 256 entries?
I recall that total number of descriptors with direct/indirect descriptors is limited to vq depth.
Was there some recent clarification occurred in the spec to clarify this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists