[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxgwA9bTvdheeZUf@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 07:45:39 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@...el.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"G, GurucharanX" <gurucharanx.g@...el.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] ice: Add set_termios tty operations handle to
GNSS
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:55:59PM +0000, Michalik, Michal wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Thanks - answer inline.
As is required, no need to put this on your emails, as top-posting is
not allowed :)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 8:16 AM
> > To: Michalik, Michal <michal.michalik@...el.com>
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; davem@...emloft.net; pabeni@...hat.com; edumazet@...gle.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; richardcochran@...il.com; G, GurucharanX <gurucharanx.g@...el.com>; Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>; Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] ice: Add set_termios tty operations handle to GNSS
Please fix your email client to not do this.
> > > Adding this empty function solved the problem.
> >
> > That seems very wrong, please work to fix this by NOT having an empty
> > function like this as it should not be required.
> >
>
> I don't get one thing, though. You are saying, it "seem" wrong and that
> "should not" be required but I observe different behavior. I have prepared
> a very simple code to reproduce the issue:
> #include <termios.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <errno.h>
>
> int main()
> {
> struct termios tty;
> int fd;
>
> fd = open("/dev/ttyGNSS_0300", O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY | O_SYNC);
>
> if (fd < 0) {
> printf("Error - TTY not open.\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> if (tcgetattr (fd, &tty) != 0) {
> printf("Error on get - errno=%i\n", errno);
> return -1;
> }
> tty.c_cflag |= CS8; // try to set 8 data bits
> if (tcsetattr(fd, TCSANOW, &tty) != 0) {
> printf("Error on set - errno=%i\n", errno);
> return -1;
> }
>
> close(fd);
> printf("Done.\n");
> }
>
> In this case, when I don't satisfy this API, I get an errno 22.
You get the error on the first get or the set?
> If add this
> empty function and therefore implement the full API it works as expected (no
> error). In our case no action is needed, therefore we have an empty function.
> At the moment, I'm not sure how I should fix it other way - since no action
> on HW is neccessary.
This should not be needed as I thought the default would be "just ignore
this", but maybe not. Can you look into this problem please and figure
out why this is required and fix that up?
> Of course in the meantime we are working on investigating if we can easily
> align to existing GNSS interface accroding to community suggestions. Still,
> we believe that this fix is solving the problem at the moment.
Let's fix the root problem here, not paper over it.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists