[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220908120016.473c144c.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:00:16 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>
Cc: <saeedm@...dia.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
<maorg@...dia.com>, <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull mlx5 vfio changes
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 20:31:35 +0300
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com> wrote:
> On 08/09/2022 19:53, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:31:13 +0300
> > Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 01:21:19PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 12:43:44 +0300
> >>> Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Alex,
> >>>>
> >>>> This series is based on clean 6.0-rc4 as such it causes to two small merge
> >>>> conficts whis vfio-next. One is in thrird patch where you should take whole
> >>>> chunk for include/uapi/linux/vfio.h as is. Another is in vfio_main.c around
> >>>> header includes, which you should take too.
> >>> Is there any reason you can't provide a topic branch for the two
> >>> net/mlx5 patches and the remainder are rebased and committed through
> >>> the vfio tree?
> >> You added your Acked-by to vfio/mlx5 patches and for me it is a sign to
> >> prepare clean PR with whole series.
> >>
> >> I reset mlx5-vfio topic to have only two net/mlx5 commits without
> >> special tag.
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git topic/mlx5-vfio
> >> Everything else can go directly to your tree without my intervention.
> > Sorry, I knew the intention initially was to send a PR and I didn't
> > think about the conflicts we'd have versus the base you'd use. Thanks
> > for splitting this out, I think it'll make for a cleaner upstream path
> > given the clear code split.
> >
> > Yishai, can you post a v7 rebased on the vfio next branch?
>
>
> Sure
>
> Do you want me to include in V7 the two net/mlx5 patches that are part
> of the PR or that you'll take them first from the PR, publish your
> vfio/next tree and I'll drop them from V7 ?
For the sake of having a series that compiles and doesn't confuse
anyone with buildbot errors, please include them, but I'll pull them
from Leon's topic branch rather than applying them directly. Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists