netdev - Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull mlx5 vfio changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YxmMMR3u1VRedWdK@unreal>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:31:13 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     saeedm@...dia.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kuba@...nel.org, kevin.tian@...el.com, joao.m.martins@...cle.com,
        yishaih@...dia.com, maorg@...dia.com, cohuck@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull mlx5 vfio changes

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 01:21:19PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Sep 2022 12:43:44 +0300
> Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Alex,
> > 
> > This series is based on clean 6.0-rc4 as such it causes to two small merge
> > conficts whis vfio-next. One is in thrird patch where you should take whole
> > chunk for include/uapi/linux/vfio.h as is. Another is in vfio_main.c around
> > header includes, which you should take too.
> 
> Is there any reason you can't provide a topic branch for the two
> net/mlx5 patches and the remainder are rebased and committed through
> the vfio tree?  

You added your Acked-by to vfio/mlx5 patches and for me it is a sign to
prepare clean PR with whole series.

I reset mlx5-vfio topic to have only two net/mlx5 commits without
special tag.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git topic/mlx5-vfio
Everything else can go directly to your tree without my intervention.

Thanks