netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxxx: Add RMU functionality.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 11 Sep 2022 16:53:20 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Mattias Forsblad <mattias.forsblad@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxxx: Add RMU
 functionality.

On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 08:37:17AM +0200, Mattias Forsblad wrote:
> >> +	chip->rmu.rmu_ops->get_rmon = mv88e6xxx_rmu_stats_get;
> >> +
> >> +	if (chip->info->ops->rmu_disable)
> >> +		return chip->info->ops->rmu_disable(chip);
> > 
> > Why is a setup function calling disable?
> 
> So Vladimir Oltean commented before:
> "I think it's very important for the RMU to still start as disabled.
> You enable it dynamically when the master goes up."

This, plus the fact that mv88e6xxx_rmu_setup() already exists in the
tree, and calls chip->info->ops->rmu_disable(). It seems like that
doesn't need to change. Mattias is moving it around, and makes it seem
as if something is being changed. Maybe simple code movement could be
split into a separate change.