lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2022 15:52:35 +0000
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
CC:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 net-next 6/8] net: dsa: felix: populate mac_capabilities
 for all ports

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 08:47:47AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> > This is true. I am also a bit surprised at Colin's choices to
> > (a) not ask the netdev maintainers to pull into net-next the immutable
> >     branch that Lee provided here:
> >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YxrjyHcceLOFlT%2Fc@google.com/
> >     and instead send some patches for review which are difficult to
> >     apply directly to any tree
> 
> As mentioned in the cover letter, I don't expect this to necessarily be
> ready by the next merge window. But seemingly I misjudged whether
> merging the net-next and Lee's tree would be more tedious for the netdev
> maintainers than looking at the RFC for reviewers. I'm trying to create
> as little hassle for people as I can. Apologies.

What is it exactly that is keeping this patch set from being ready for 6.1?
There's still time...

It mostly looks ok to me, I'm in the process of reviewing it. You
mentioned documentation in the cover letter; I suppose you're talking
about dt-schema? If so, I just started off by converting ocelot.txt to
mscc,ocelot.yaml, since I know that the conversion process is typically
a bit daunting to even start.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220912153702.246206-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ