[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220912114117.l2ufqv5forkpehif@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:41:18 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 net-next 6/8] net: dsa: felix: populate mac_capabilities
for all ports
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 01:16:21PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Therefore, I think you can drop this patch from your series and
> > you won't see any functional change.
>
> This is true. I am also a bit surprised at Colin's choices to
> (b) split the work he submitted such that he populates mac_capabilities
> but does not make any use of it (not call phylink_generic_validate
> from anywhere). We try as much as possible to not leave dead code
> behind in the mainline tree, even if future work is intended to
> bring it to life. I do understand that this is an RFC so the patches
> weren't intended to be applied as is, but it is still confusing to
> review a change which, as you've correctly pointed out, has no
> effect to the git tree as it stands.
Ah, I retract this comment; after actually looking at all the patches, I
do see that in patch 8/8, Colin does call phylink_generic_validate().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists