| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:14:15 -0700
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+915f3e317adb0e85835f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
"Zach O'Keefe" <zokeefe@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, bpf@...r.kernel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, david@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kafai@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, luto@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, songliubraving@...com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] BUG: Bad page map (5)
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 2:47 PM Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 9:27 PM syzbot
> <syzbot+915f3e317adb0e85835f@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> >
> > HEAD commit: e47eb90a0a9a Add linux-next specific files for 20220901
> > git tree: linux-next
> > console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17330430880000
> > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=7933882276523081
> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=915f3e317adb0e85835f
> > compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
> > syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=13397b77080000
> > C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1793564f080000
> >
> > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > Reported-by: syzbot+915f3e317adb0e85835f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> >
> > BUG: Bad page map in process syz-executor198 pte:8000000071c00227 pmd:74b30067
> > addr:0000000020563000 vm_flags:08100077 anon_vma:ffff8880547d2200 mapping:0000000000000000 index:20563
> > file:(null) fault:0x0 mmap:0x0 read_folio:0x0
> > CPU: 1 PID: 3614 Comm: syz-executor198 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc3-next-20220901-syzkaller #0
> > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/26/2022
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> > dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> > print_bad_pte.cold+0x2a7/0x2d0 mm/memory.c:565
> > vm_normal_page+0x10c/0x2a0 mm/memory.c:636
> > hpage_collapse_scan_pmd+0x729/0x1da0 mm/khugepaged.c:1199
> > madvise_collapse+0x481/0x910 mm/khugepaged.c:2433
> > madvise_vma_behavior+0xd0a/0x1cc0 mm/madvise.c:1062
> > madvise_walk_vmas+0x1c7/0x2b0 mm/madvise.c:1236
> > do_madvise.part.0+0x24a/0x340 mm/madvise.c:1415
> > do_madvise mm/madvise.c:1428 [inline]
> > __do_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1428 [inline]
> > __se_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1426 [inline]
> > __x64_sys_madvise+0x113/0x150 mm/madvise.c:1426
> > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> > do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> > RIP: 0033:0x7f770ba87929
> > Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 11 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > RSP: 002b:00007f770ba18308 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000001c
> > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f770bb0f3f8 RCX: 00007f770ba87929
> > RDX: 0000000000000019 RSI: 0000000000600003 RDI: 0000000020000000
> > RBP: 00007f770bb0f3f0 R08: 00007f770ba18700 R09: 0000000000000000
> > R10: 00007f770ba18700 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f770bb0f3fc
> > R13: 00007ffc2d8b62ef R14: 00007f770ba18400 R15: 0000000000022000
> > </TASK>
>
> I think I figured out the problem. The reproducer actually triggered
> the below race in madvise_collapse():
>
> CPU A
> CPU B
> mmap 0x20000000 - 0x21000000 as anon
>
> madvise_collapse is called on this area
>
> Retrieve start and end address from the vma (NEVER updated
> later!)
>
> Collapsed the first 2M area and dropped mmap_lock
> Acquire mmap_lock
> mmap io_uring file at 0x20563000
> Release mmap_lock
>
> Reacquire mmap_lock
>
> revalidate vma pass since 0x20200000 + 0x200000 >
> 0x20563000
>
> scan the next 2M (0x20200000 - 0x20400000), but due to
> whatever reason it didn't release mmap_lock
>
> scan the 3rd 2M area (start from 0x20400000)
>
> actually scan the new vma created by io_uring since the
> end was never updated
>
> The below patch should be able to fix the problem (untested):
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 5f7c60b8b269..e708c5d62325 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -2441,8 +2441,10 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct
> *vma, struct vm_area_struct **prev,
> memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
> result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma, addr, &mmap_locked,
> cc);
> - if (!mmap_locked)
> + if (!mmap_locked) {
> *prev = NULL; /* Tell caller we dropped mmap_lock */
> + hend = vma->end & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
> + }
This is wrong. We should refetch the vma end after
hugepage_vma_revalidate() otherwise the vma is still the old one.
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index a3acd3e5e0f3..1860be232a26 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -2592,6 +2592,8 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct vm_area_struct **prev,
last_fail = result;
goto out_nolock;
}
+
+ hend = vma->vm_end & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
}
mmap_assert_locked(mm);
memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
>
> switch (result) {
> case SCAN_SUCCEED:
>
>
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists