[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220919101802.4f4d1a86@hermes.local>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:18:02 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Patrick Rohr <prohr@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Network Development Mailing List
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Maciej Żenczykowski"
<maze@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: support not enabling carrier in TUNSETIFF
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 16:45:52 -0700
Patrick Rohr <prohr@...gle.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h
> index 2ec07de1d73b..12dde91957a5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@
> #define IFF_MULTI_QUEUE 0x0100
> #define IFF_ATTACH_QUEUE 0x0200
> #define IFF_DETACH_QUEUE 0x0400
> +/* Used in TUNSETIFF to bring up tun/tap without carrier */
> +#define IFF_NO_CARRIER IFF_DETACH_QUEUE
Overloading a flag in existing user API is likely to break
some application somewhere...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists