[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fb488a102d0738ab153bf133439dd64f09d096e.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:24:57 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 03/10] net: dsa: allow the DSA master to be
seen and changed through rtnetlink
Hello,
On Sun, 2022-09-11 at 14:35 +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 04:06:59AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > +struct rtnl_link_ops dsa_link_ops __read_mostly = {
> > + .kind = "dsa",
> > + .priv_size = sizeof(struct dsa_port),
> > + .maxtype = IFLA_DSA_MAX,
> > + .policy = dsa_policy,
> > + .changelink = dsa_changelink,
> > + .get_size = dsa_get_size,
> > + .fill_info = dsa_fill_info,
> > +};
>
> I forgot to apply Jakub's suggestion to set netns_refund = true.
> On the other hand, I think the patches are otherwise fine, and I
> wouldn't resend them, especially without any feedback. If there is no
> other feedback, can I fix this up through an incremental patch?
Since the delta should be minimal, we have a significant backlog, and
this LGTM, I'm going to apply the series as-is.
Please follow-up with the incremental fix, thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists