netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v14 3/7] net: dsa: Introduce dsa tagger data operation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:10:02 +0200
From:   Mattias Forsblad <mattias.forsblad@...il.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        ansuelsmth@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v14 3/7] net: dsa: Introduce dsa tagger data
 operation.

On 2022-09-20 12:31, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 08:41:30AM +0200, Mattias Forsblad wrote:
>>> Can you please also parse the sequence number here, so the
>>> decode_frame2reg() data consumer doesn't have to concern itself with the
>>> dsa_header at all?
>>
>> The sequence number is in the chip structure which isn't available here.
>> Should we really access that here in the dsa layer?
> 
> I'm talking about this sequence number:
> 
> mv88e6xxx_decode_frame2reg_handler:
> 
> 	/* Decode Frame2Reg DSA portion */
> 	dsa_header = skb->data - 2;
> 
> 	seqno = dsa_header[3];
> 
> I'm saying, if you get the seqno in net/dsa/tag_dsa.c and pass it as
> argument to mv88e6xxx_decode_frame2reg_handler(), then you should no
> longer have a reason to look at the dsa_header from drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/.

Ok, I misunderstood your intent. I'll change. Thanks.

/Mattias