[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220920072948.33c25dd2@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:29:48 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Casper Andersson <casper.casan@...il.com>
Cc: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sparx5: Fix return type of sparx5_port_xmit_impl
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:15:48 +0200 Casper Andersson wrote:
> I noticed that the functions that assign the return value inside
> sparx5_port_xmit_impl also have return type int, which would ideally
> also be changed. But a bigger issue might be that
> sparx5_ptp_txtstamp_request and sparx5_inject (called inside
> sparx5_port_xmit_impl) returns -EBUSY (-16),
Yes, that seems off. IIUC error codes are treated as drops,
but the driver doesn't free the frame. So it's likely a leak.
> when they should return NETDEV_TX_BUSY (16). If this is an issue then
> it also needs to be fixed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists