[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31249c57-a705-510f-aad3-62c32d4ff1fc@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:51:21 +0800
From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: mst <mst@...hat.com>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vDPA: allow userspace to query features of a vDPA
device
On 9/21/2022 3:44 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:00 PM Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/21/2022 10:17 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 5:58 PM Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/20/2022 10:02 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 5:05 PM Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com> wrote:
>>>>>> This commit adds a new vDPA netlink attribution
>>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_VDPA_DEV_SUPPORTED_FEATURES. Userspace can query
>>>>>> features of vDPA devices through this new attr.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This commit invokes vdpa_config_ops.get_config() than
>>>>>> vdpa_get_config_unlocked() to read the device config
>>>>>> spcae, so no raeces in vdpa_set_features_unlocked()
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
>>>>> It's better to share the userspace code as well.
>>>> OK, will share it in V2.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>> include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h | 4 ++++
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
>>>>>> index c06c02704461..798a02c7aa94 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
>>>>>> @@ -491,6 +491,8 @@ static int vdpa_mgmtdev_fill(const struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *mdev, struct sk_buff *m
>>>>>> err = -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>>> goto msg_err;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* report features of a vDPA management device through VDPA_ATTR_DEV_SUPPORTED_FEATURES */
>>>>> The code explains itself, there's no need for the comment.
>>>> these comments are required in other discussions
>>> I think it's more than sufficient to clarify the semantic where it is defined.
>> OK, then only comments in the header file
>>>>>> if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_SUPPORTED_FEATURES,
>>>>>> mdev->supported_features, VDPA_ATTR_PAD)) {
>>>>>> err = -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>>> @@ -815,10 +817,10 @@ static int vdpa_dev_net_mq_config_fill(struct vdpa_device *vdev,
>>>>>> static int vdpa_dev_net_config_fill(struct vdpa_device *vdev, struct sk_buff *msg)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct virtio_net_config config = {};
>>>>>> - u64 features;
>>>>>> + u64 features_device, features_driver;
>>>>>> u16 val_u16;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - vdpa_get_config_unlocked(vdev, 0, &config, sizeof(config));
>>>>>> + vdev->config->get_config(vdev, 0, &config, sizeof(config));
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (nla_put(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MACADDR, sizeof(config.mac),
>>>>>> config.mac))
>>>>>> @@ -832,12 +834,19 @@ static int vdpa_dev_net_config_fill(struct vdpa_device *vdev, struct sk_buff *ms
>>>>>> if (nla_put_u16(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU, val_u16))
>>>>>> return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - features = vdev->config->get_driver_features(vdev);
>>>>>> - if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NEGOTIATED_FEATURES, features,
>>>>>> + features_driver = vdev->config->get_driver_features(vdev);
>>>>>> + if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NEGOTIATED_FEATURES, features_driver,
>>>>>> + VDPA_ATTR_PAD))
>>>>>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + features_device = vdev->config->get_device_features(vdev);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* report features of a vDPA device through VDPA_ATTR_VDPA_DEV_SUPPORTED_FEATURES */
>>>>>> + if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, VDPA_ATTR_VDPA_DEV_SUPPORTED_FEATURES, features_device,
>>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_PAD))
>>>>>> return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - return vdpa_dev_net_mq_config_fill(vdev, msg, features, &config);
>>>>>> + return vdpa_dev_net_mq_config_fill(vdev, msg, features_driver, &config);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h b/include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h
>>>>>> index 25c55cab3d7c..97531b52dcbe 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vdpa.h
>>>>>> @@ -46,12 +46,16 @@ enum vdpa_attr {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NEGOTIATED_FEATURES, /* u64 */
>>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_DEV_MGMTDEV_MAX_VQS, /* u32 */
>>>>>> + /* features of a vDPA management device */
>>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_DEV_SUPPORTED_FEATURES, /* u64 */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_DEV_QUEUE_INDEX, /* u32 */
>>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_DEV_VENDOR_ATTR_NAME, /* string */
>>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_DEV_VENDOR_ATTR_VALUE, /* u64 */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + /* features of a vDPA device, e.g., /dev/vhost-vdpa0 */
>>>>>> + VDPA_ATTR_VDPA_DEV_SUPPORTED_FEATURES, /* u64 */
>>>>> What's the difference between this and VDPA_ATTR_DEV_SUPPORTED_FEATURES?
>>>> This is to report a vDPA device features, and
>>>> VDPA_ATTR_DEV_SUPPORTED_FEATURES
>>>> is used for reporting the management device features, we have a long
>>>> discussion
>>>> on this before.
>>> Yes, but the comment is not clear in many ways:
>>>
>>> " features of a vDPA management device" sounds like features that is
>>> out of the scope of the virtio.
>> I think the term "vDPA device" implies that it is a virtio device.
>> So how about: "virtio features of a vDPA management device"
> Not a native speaker, but how about "virtio features that are
> supported by the vDPA management device?"
OK
>
> Thanks
>
>>> And
>>>
>>> "/dev/vhost-vdpa0" is not a vDPA device but a vhost-vDPA device.
>> will remove this example here.
>>
>> Thanks
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> /* new attributes must be added above here */
>>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_MAX,
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.31.1
>>>>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists