[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220921075927.3ace0307@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:59:27 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow full
offload configuration
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:56:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> I have TX traces too and can add if RX are not sufficient.
The perf trace is good, but for those of us not intimately familiar
with xfrm, could you provide some analysis here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists