netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220922073554.GH2950045@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:35:54 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow full
 offload configuration

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:17:31AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 12:31:11PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 04:15:34PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > 
> > <...>
> > 
> > > Leon Romanovsky (8):
> > >   xfrm: add new full offload flag
> > >   xfrm: allow state full offload mode
> > >   xfrm: add an interface to offload policy
> > >   xfrm: add TX datapath support for IPsec full offload mode
> > >   xfrm: add RX datapath protection for IPsec full offload mode
> > >   xfrm: enforce separation between priorities of HW/SW policies
> > >   xfrm: add support to HW update soft and hard limits
> > >   xfrm: document IPsec full offload mode
> > 
> > Kindly reminder.
> 
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> Can we please progress with the series? I would like to see it is merged
> in this merge window, so I will be able to progress with iproute2 and mlx5
> code too.
> 
> It is approximately 3 weeks already in the ML without any objections.
> The implementation proposed here has nothing specific to our HW and
> applicable to other vendors as well.

I've just replied to our private thread about this. I'll have a look
at the patches tomorrow. I've just returned from vacation and still
a bit backloged...