[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f6ba289-050a-f77b-3cd2-694317f070bb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:07:38 +0200
From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Stop the CLC flow if no link to map buffers
on
On 22.09.22 10:29, Wen Gu wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/9/20 14:43, Wen Gu wrote:
>
>> There might be a potential race between SMC-R buffer map and
>> link group termination.
>>
>> smc_smcr_terminate_all() | smc_connect_rdma()
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> | smc_conn_create()
>> for links in smcibdev |
>> schedule links down |
>> | smc_buf_create()
>> | \- smcr_buf_map_usable_links()
>> | \- no usable links found,
>> | (rmb->mr = NULL)
>> |
>> | smc_clc_send_confirm()
>> | \- access conn->rmb_desc->mr[]->rkey
>> | (panic)
>>
>> During reboot and IB device module remove, all links will be set
>> down and no usable links remain in link groups. In such situation
>> smcr_buf_map_usable_links() should return an error and stop the
>> CLC flow accessing to uninitialized mr.
>>
>> Fixes: b9247544c1bc ("net/smc: convert static link ID instances to
>> support multiple links")
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> net/smc/smc_core.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
>> index ebf56cd..df89c2e 100644
>> --- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
>> +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
>> @@ -2239,7 +2239,7 @@ static struct smc_buf_desc
>> *smcr_new_buf_create(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
>> static int smcr_buf_map_usable_links(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
>> struct smc_buf_desc *buf_desc, bool is_rmb)
>> {
>> - int i, rc = 0;
>> + int i, rc = 0, cnt = 0;
>> /* protect against parallel link reconfiguration */
>> mutex_lock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
>> @@ -2252,9 +2252,12 @@ static int smcr_buf_map_usable_links(struct
>> smc_link_group *lgr,
>> rc = -ENOMEM;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> + cnt++;
>> }
>> out:
>> mutex_unlock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
>> + if (!rc && !cnt)
>> + rc = -EINVAL;
>> return rc;
>> }
>
> Any comments or reviews are welcome and appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Wen Gu
Sorry for the late answer!
Good catch! Thank you!
Acked-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists