[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220921180640.696efb1a@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 18:06:40 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Cc: "kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] treewide: Add R-Car S4-8 Ethernet Switch support
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:46:34 +0000 Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> I thought we have 2 types about the use of the treewide:
> 1) Completely depends on multiple subsystems and/or
> change multiple subsystems in a patch.
> 2) Convenient for review.
>
> This patch series type is the 2) above. However, should I use
> treewide for the 1) only?
I thought "treewide" means you're changing something across the tree.
If you want to get a new platform reviewed I'd just post the patches
as RFC without any prefix in the subject. But I could be wrong.
My main point (which I did a pretty poor job of actually making)
was that for the networking driver to be merged it needs to get
posted separately.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists