[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220922140620.1c032401@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:06:20 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: Fix return value of qdisc ingress handling
on success
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:23:49 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> What I meant is we don't merge fixes into net-next directly.
> Perhaps that's my personal view, not shared by other netdev maintainers.
FWIW I've seen Eric posting a fix against net-next today
so I may indeed be the only one who thinks this way :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists