lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:28:03 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 iproute2-next] ip link: add sub-command to view and
 change DSA master

On 9/22/22 13:36, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 01:28:16PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> Not sure where choice of "via" came from.  Other network os's use "next-hop"
>> or just skip having a keyword.
> 
> Jakub was saying:
> 
> $ ip link set dev swp0 type dsa via eth0
> 
> meaning: "make the locally terminated traffic of swp0 go via (through) eth0".
> No direct relationship with IP nexthops.
> 
> It avoids saying that eth0 is a DSA master.

That part was clear (at least to me). I read Stephen's questions as how 
did we come up with the keyword "via" to designated gateways in the 
first place when other network operating systems use "next-hop".

I, too, think of "via" as a printed circuit board term, so using 
"conduit" seems more in line with the vocabulary I could retain my 
muscle memory with.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ