[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220922215251.edmytm4u6uahrd3m@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 21:52:52 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 iproute2-next] ip link: add sub-command to view and
change DSA master
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:41:38PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 'via' would be totally new, and i don't see any need to introduce a
> new term.
Well, the entire command is new, so...
Jakub clarified that 'via' would indeed be used as a preposition rather
than as a noun. So it does not describe eth0, but just the relationship
between swp0 and eth0 (specifically their traffic), and therefore it
isn't really a new, or alternative, naming convention for a DSA master
(which 'conduit' is, on the other hand).
What I find a bit awkward is the 'set ... type dsa via ..." syntax,
since a noun would typically be expected in place of 'via'.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists