[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzabFB-__1bcYTb8E0ixS0dNZNcp9XNB-McWvQQ98sBR-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:38:10 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, hawk@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, trix@...hat.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for pinning to errpath
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 7:28 PM Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Add testcases for map and prog pin to errpath.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
> ---
let's drop this selftest, it does global system manipulations just to
check those two if conditions inside pathname_concat(), probably not
worth it.
Also for the future, we shouldn't use CHECK() in new selftests (we
still have CHECK()s because there are like 2 thousand of them in old
selftest, so clean up is not trivial).
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/pinning.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning_path.c | 19 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning_path.c
>
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists