lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220923055234.4714c86a@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 05:52:34 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Bhadram Varka <vbhadram@...dia.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 9/9] stmmac: tegra: Add MGBE support

On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:39:49 +0200 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Could you repost it independently of the series so that it can go thru
> > the net auto-checkers? It should be able to make 6.1 pretty comfortably.  
> 
> Done. Let me know if there's anything in the patch that needs more work.
> For the auto-checkers, do they send out notifications if they find
> anything or can I monitor them manually somewhere? Are all of those
> reported in the patchwork checks?

They are reported to patchwork, but they sometimes produce false
positives so we don't expect folks to look at the themselves. The
maintainers will reply to the submission and quote the failed checks 
as needed. 

Also note that we have a "at most one version per day" policy,
if, say, there is a build issue discovered please hold off posting
the new version for 24h. Frequent posting makes reviewing harder 
for folks who read the list top to bottom and increases ML traffic.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ