netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] nfp: add support for link auto negotiation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 04:37:58 +0000
From:   Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        oss-drivers <oss-drivers@...igine.com>,
        Fei Qin <fei.qin@...igine.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] nfp: add support for link auto negotiation

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:00:40 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:12:34 +0200 Simon Horman wrote:
> > From: Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
> >
> > Report the auto negotiation capability if it's supported
> > in management firmware, and advertise it if it's enabled.
> >
> > Changing FEC to mode other than auto or changing port
> > speed is not allowed when autoneg is enabled. And FEC mode
> > is enforced into auto mode when enabling link autoneg.
> >
> > The ethtool <intf> command displays the auto-neg capability:
> 
> > +				goto err_bad_set;
> > +		}
> 
> Please refactor this to avoid the extra indentation

Will do.

> 
> > +	if (eth_port->supp_aneg && eth_port->aneg == NFP_ANEG_AUTO &&
> fec != NFP_FEC_AUTO_BIT) {
> > +		netdev_err(netdev, "Only auto mode is allowed when link
> autoneg is enabled.\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> 
> Autoneg and AUTO fec are two completely different things.
> There was a long thread on AUTO recently.. :(

Yes, you're right, will remove this limitation.

> 
> > +		/* Not a fatal error, no need to return error to stop driver
> from loading */
> >  		nfp_warn(pf->cpp, "HWinfo(sp_indiff=%d) set failed: %d\n",
> sp_indiff, err);
> > +		err = 0;
> 
> This should be a separate commit, it seems

Will separate it.

> 
> >
> >  	nfp_nsp_close(nsp);
> >  	return err;
> > @@ -331,7 +334,23 @@ static int nfp_net_pf_cfg_nsp(struct nfp_pf *pf,
> bool sp_indiff)
> >
> >  static int nfp_net_pf_init_nsp(struct nfp_pf *pf)
> >  {
> > -	return nfp_net_pf_cfg_nsp(pf, pf->sp_indiff);
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	err = nfp_net_pf_cfg_nsp(pf, pf->sp_indiff);
> > +	if (!err) {
> > +		struct nfp_port *port;
> > +
> > +		/* The eth ports need be refreshed after nsp is configured,
> > +		 * since the eth table state may change, e.g. aneg_supp field.
> 
> No idea why, tho
> 
> > +		 * Only `CHANGED` bit is set here in case nsp needs some
> time
> > +		 * to process the configuration.
> 
> I can't parse what this is saying but doesn't look good

I think this comment is clear enough. In previous ` nfp_net_pf_cfg_nsp`, hwinfo "sp_indiff" is 
configured into Management firmware(NSP), and it decides if autoneg is supported or not and
updates eth table accordingly. And only `CHANGED` flag is set here so that with some delay driver
can get the updated eth table instead of stale info.

> 
> > +		 */
> > +		list_for_each_entry(port, &pf->ports, port_list)
> > +			if (__nfp_port_get_eth_port(port))
> > +				set_bit(NFP_PORT_CHANGED, &port->flags);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return err;
> >  }