netdev - [PATCH net-next 02/11] can: bcm: check the result of can_send() in bcm_can

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220923120859.740577-3-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:08:50 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 02/11] can: bcm: check the result of can_send() in bcm_can_tx()

From: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>

If can_send() fail, it should not update frames_abs counter
in bcm_can_tx(). Add the result check for can_send() in bcm_can_tx().

Suggested-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Suggested-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9851878e74d6d37aee2f1ee76d68361a46f89458.1663206163.git.william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
 net/can/bcm.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index 0a2adb844280..27706f6ace34 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ static void bcm_can_tx(struct bcm_op *op)
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct canfd_frame *cf = op->frames + op->cfsiz * op->currframe;
+	int err;
 
 	/* no target device? => exit */
 	if (!op->ifindex)
@@ -298,11 +299,11 @@ static void bcm_can_tx(struct bcm_op *op)
 	/* send with loopback */
 	skb->dev = dev;
 	can_skb_set_owner(skb, op->sk);
-	can_send(skb, 1);
+	err = can_send(skb, 1);
+	if (!err)
+		op->frames_abs++;
 
-	/* update statistics */
 	op->currframe++;
-	op->frames_abs++;
 
 	/* reached last frame? */
 	if (op->currframe >= op->nframes)
-- 
2.35.1