netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] dt-bindings: net: tsnep: Allow dma-coherent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7782924b-9664-6946-f8f6-c70cec618df9@engleder-embedded.com>
Date:   Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:14:49 +0200
From:   Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] dt-bindings: net: tsnep: Allow
 dma-coherent

On 25.09.22 09:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/09/2022 20:11, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
>> On 24.09.22 11:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2022 22:29, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
>>>> Fix the following dtbs_check error if dma-coherent is used:
>>>>
>>>> ...: 'dma-coherent' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>>>   From schema: .../Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/engleder,tsnep.yaml
>>>
>>> Skip last line - it's obvious. What instead you miss here - the
>>> DTS/target which has this warning. I assume that some existing DTS uses
>>> this property?
>>
>> I will skip that line.
>>
>> The binding is for an FPGA based Ethernet MAC. I'm working with
>> an evaluation platform currently. The DTS for the evaluation platform
>> is mainline, but my derived DTS was not accepted mainline. So there is
>> no DTS. This is similar for other FPGA based devices.
> 
> If this is not coming from mainline, then there is no warning...  we are
> not interested in warnings in out-of-tree code, because we are not
> fixing them.

Ok. So I would rewrite the description that it just allows dma-coherent
and remove the fix/warning stuff. Is that ok?

Thanks!

Gerhard