[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzFYYXcZaoPXcLz/@corigine.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:44:33 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: use netdev_unregistering instead of
open code
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 01:09:35AM +0900, Juhee Kang wrote:
> [You don't often get email from claudiajkang@...il.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> The open code is defined as a helper function(netdev_unregistering)
> on netdev.h, which the open code is dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNREGISTERING.
> Thus, netdev_unregistering() replaces the open code. This patch doesn't
> change logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 9 ++++-----
> net/core/net-sysfs.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index d66c73c1c734..f3f9394f0b5a 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2886,8 +2886,7 @@ int netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txq)
> if (txq < 1 || txq > dev->num_tx_queues)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED ||
> - dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNREGISTERING) {
> + if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED || netdev_unregistering(dev)) {
> ASSERT_RTNL();
>
> rc = netdev_queue_update_kobjects(dev, dev->real_num_tx_queues,
Is there any value in adding a netdev_registered() helper?
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists