netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: use netdev_unregistering instead of open code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK+SQuRj=caHiyrtVySVoxRrhNttfg_cSbNFjG2PL7Fc0_ObGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:05:08 +0900
From:   Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@...il.com>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: use netdev_unregistering instead of
 open code

Hi Simon,
Thanks a lot for your review!

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 4:44 PM Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 01:09:35AM +0900, Juhee Kang wrote:
> > [You don't often get email from claudiajkang@...il.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> >
> > The open code is defined as a helper function(netdev_unregistering)
> > on netdev.h, which the open code is dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNREGISTERING.
> > Thus, netdev_unregistering() replaces the open code. This patch doesn't
> > change logic.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
>
> > ---
> >  net/core/dev.c       | 9 ++++-----
> >  net/core/net-sysfs.c | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index d66c73c1c734..f3f9394f0b5a 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -2886,8 +2886,7 @@ int netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txq)
> >         if (txq < 1 || txq > dev->num_tx_queues)
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -       if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED ||
> > -           dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNREGISTERING) {
> > +       if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED || netdev_unregistering(dev)) {
> >                 ASSERT_RTNL();
> >
> >                 rc = netdev_queue_update_kobjects(dev, dev->real_num_tx_queues,
>
> Is there any value in adding a netdev_registered() helper?
>

The open code which is reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED used 37 times on
some codes related to the network. I think that the
netdev_registered() helper is valuable.

> ...

Best regards,
Juhee