[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7oY+m3c83b0qgoJjxG=rL6ErnrF2_+UZ9hiQ85H9ZSdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:26:12 -0700
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: drop the weight argument from netif_napi_add
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:21 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 6:28 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > We tell driver developers to always pass NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT
> > as the weight to netif_napi_add(). This may be confusing
> > to newcomers, drop the weight argument, those who really
> > need to tweak the weight can use netif_napi_add_weight().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>
> Sure, but this kind of patch makes backports harder.
> Not sure how confused are newcomers about this NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT....
Ironically we've been fiddling with dramatically reducing the
NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT (8) on
several multicore arm systems, with good results, especially on ath10k.
--
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
Powered by blists - more mailing lists